Hi all, 

When researching the concept of "produsage" this week, it occurred to me that if one intends to contribute in an ethical manner, then that carries with it certain responsibilities to ensure that what you contribute is grounded in truth and contextual integrity. A good example of this would be the relatively new phenomenon of the citizen journalist. In recent years we have all become familiar with the term "fake news." This term has been applied to both well-established news organizations that have wide distribution as well as individuals with limited reach and whose only platform is social media. Unlike news organizations that are businesses at heart, and thus accountable to shareholders and the public (hence the use of retractions for false or mistaken content) citizen journalists have few accountability mechanisms. For example, when reposting a story, added commentary can sometimes be mistaken for verifiable facts. Make no mistake, commentary facilitates discourse; it is part of our right as citizens and should be encouraged, but commentary that ignores opposing viewpoints or important parts of the narrative can be misleading. On the other hand, one could argue that it is a person's own responsibility to research issues that are important to them and placing unquestioning trust into a singular source (especially one where credibility and reputation are dubious) may be unhelpful. There does not appear to any easy solution to this issue. Ultimately, in the media environment we have, as consumers maybe all we can do is be extra-careful to question what we read or hear from any news source. From the perspective of a produser, I would hope that adhering to some type of ethical standard would be observed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog